The price isn't in the release. Neither are launch countries or a ship date. Samsung hadn't published anything about preorders as of Thursday afternoon, and Google hasn't separately announced the launch. Gentle Monster, the other frame partner, hasn't confirmed the date either. Any price you see before the 12th is a leak or a guess.

What we do know about the hardware

The glasses run Android XR with Gemini built in. Samsung makes the hardware, with Qualcomm chips inside, and Warby Parker and Gentle Monster handle the frame designs. They have cameras, microphones and speakers, but no display in the lenses. You control them by voice or a touch panel on the frame. So think of them as Google's answer to Meta's Ray-Ban glasses, not as an AR headset you wear on your face.

Meta has a big head start. One report puts its share of AI glasses shipments at 94%, with the category growing 263% in the first half of the year. Google is arriving late to a market that's already filling up, and a hard date is the first concrete thing it has to show.

Who should care, and who should wait

If you already wear glasses every day, this is the group most likely to benefit. Warby Parker has 364 stores, and you can already book a demo slot on its website. Trying frames on before paying is a real advantage for something that sits on your face all day.

Everyone else should hold off on that first-day click. Preordering a camera-equipped wearable without knowing the price is a bad habit, and some basics are still unanswered. We don't know the base price versus the price with prescription lenses. We don't know whether the holiday delivery window means before Thanksgiving week or sometime in December. Phandroid notes that "holiday season" leaves room for either.

There's one more reason to be cautious. A smart-glasses checkout price can differ from the headline frame price. Prescription lenses are exactly where that gap tends to show up, and glasses are one product where almost everyone needs them.

Warby Parker also told investors its full-year guidance now includes a modest contribution from the glasses. That suggests the company expects to book revenue before December 31, so a real shipping window looks likely.

What to do

Before the 12th, decide whether you want audio-only glasses at all, since there's no screen to show you directions or messages. On the day, check the total price with your prescription, the delivery estimate and the return policy before you commit. If any of those are vague, wait a few weeks. The glasses will still be there, and reviewers will have had time to try them.

My take

This would be a really good innovation by google with its partnership with Warby parker , and seriously with the design i would consider buying this if only it comes out with a good prices but overall i think google is cooking this year , with the google fit air and this ? jezz

Sources: Phandroid, Droid Life, VR.org, VGTimes, BigGo Finance, AndroidPure

Your headset won't stop working. Meta is ending feature work and, eventually, patching. It isn't disabling anything. But the practical effects start well before the final cutoff.

What changes

New OS features, platform capabilities and APIs released after v213 will only come to the Meta Quest 3, the Meta Quest 3S and newer devices. Meta also says it won't test new OS and SDK releases against the older headsets. App submissions that support them are accepted through December 2027, and new titles can still launch on newer hardware without being offered on the old ones.

Developers can keep updating existing games for Quest 2 and Quest Pro. If they drop support in a way that would cost you content or services, they're supposed to give you at least 180 days' notice. That's the thing to watch for in your library.

The timeline is a little fuzzy in coverage

Some headlines say support ends at the end of 2027. Others say updates end in March 2027. Both are roughly right, but they mean different things. March is when the features stop. December is when the safety net goes. For a headset on your home Wi-Fi, that second date is the one that matters.

Who got the worse deal

The Quest 2 launched in October 2020, so owners get a little over seven years of security support. The Quest Pro arrived in October 2022 and gets just over five. Per Wikipedia, it launched at $1,499.99, and Meta discontinued it in 2024 anyway. If you paid that, this stings.

My take

If you own a Quest 2 and mostly play what you already have, do nothing. It's fine through 2027. The part to skip is buying a used one because it's cheap. You'd be paying for a headset that's already on the way out, and new games will increasingly target Quest 3-class hardware.

If you want to upgrade, the Meta Quest 3 and Meta Quest 3S are the supported options. Road to VR reports Meta VR Glasses are coming next spring, so anyone who's undecided might wait for that launch before spending money. I'd hold off until real details are out. Prices and specs for those glasses weren't in the sources I found.

Meanwhile, an old Quest 2 still makes a decent spare headset for guests, as long as you keep it updated and off anything sensitive. Check for developer notices in your favorite games, and plan the upgrade for sometime in 2027, not the last week of December.

My take

The Meta Quest is a way better device than Apple’s Vision Pro. It mixes a bit of everything into one headset. I think waiting is worth it, especially for the AI features that might come with Meta’s next release.

Sources: Road to VR, UploadVR, Android Authority, TechRadar, Social Media Today, Wikipedia

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The numbers

Google announced the phone on August 12 and it went on sale August 20. Android Headlines lists the starting price at $1,899 for 256GB, up $100 from the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, which launched at $1,799. All three storage tiers (256GB, 512GB, 1TB) carry 16GB of RAM. Some spec aggregators show different prices, both lower and higher, so check the live price at a retailer before you assume anything. Street prices have clearly been moving.

What you get

• An 8.0-inch inner OLED at 2076 x 2152, running 1 to 120Hz, plus a 6.5-inch cover screen.
• Google's Tensor G6 chip and a 4,806 mAh battery.
• A titanium frame, IP68 protection and 239 g of weight. It's 5mm thick unfolded and about 10.1mm folded.
• Android 17, with seven years of updates promised.
• 25W Qi2.2 wireless charging, per Wikipedia's spec table.

Android Headlines calls it an iterative upgrade with some meaningful improvements. That tracks with the spec sheet. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold has the same boxy inner display, the same general design and a chip bump. The one clear change is that every tier gets 16GB of RAM.

Who should care

If you already own a Pixel 10 Pro Fold, skip this one. Nothing here justifies paying a premium for a refresh, and the price hike makes it worse. The seven-year update pledge also means last year's model isn't going to age out soon.

If you want a foldable that runs a clean Pixel build of Android and you're coming from a regular phone or an older Pixel Fold, it's a reasonable pick. The IP68 rating matters here, since plenty of foldables still skimp on dust protection. Android Headlines' verdict is that it's the best Pixel Fold yet, which is true, and it's also the only one Google is making this year.

The overhyped part is the AI pitch. The Pixel 11 series debuted Gemini Intelligence, an agentic framework meant to do tasks on your behalf. That's software, and it will matter more once you've lived with it for a few months. It's not a reason to spend $1,899 on day one.

What to do

Get the 256GB model unless you shoot lots of video, since every tier has the same RAM. Check whether Amazon or Google is running a gift card or trade-in promo. Android Headlines' buying guide flagged a $350 Amazon gift card when it was written. Foldables tend to get discounted within a few months of launch, and with the holidays close, waiting a few weeks is the cheap move

My take

I can go straight to the point and say it basically the same thing from the previous model which is basically what it is , but the changes in the new model with not such a big upgrade to come from the previous model, which i think with everybody's opinion is not a big upgrade , unless the tech reviewers who are paid to do it .

Sources: Android Headlines, GSMArena, Wikipedia, TechCrunch, Memeburn

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Here's what the early lists show as of Nov. 3, so check live prices before you click.

The cheap stuff has the best cuts

• Ring Battery Doorbell 2K: $40, was $99
• Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Plus: $40, was $70
• Apple iPad 11-inch (A16): $400, was $449
• AirPods Pro 3: $199, was $249

Those are from Yahoo's early deals roundup. The same list has the Apple iPad mini (A17 Pro) at $569 at Amazon, though it doesn't say what the regular price is, so I can't tell you how good that one is.

Apple's discounts are real but modest

MacRumors is tracking Apple gear at or near its lowest prices. The Apple Watch Ultra 4 is $699.99 at Amazon, down $99 from $799. The M5 MacBook Air is $1,099.99, which is $199 off. The MacBook Neo is $669.22, a $30 cut from $699, and MacRumors calls that discount rare.

The MacBook Air deal needs context. MacRumors says Amazon's $199 cut matches the best prices it has seen since a price hike. So it's good compared with today's sticker, not compared with what the laptop cost before the increase. Apple's Mac mini has been discounted by $119 to $150 for weeks, with prices starting at $779.99. A deal that's been running for weeks isn't going to vanish tomorrow.

What I'd do

If you've been meaning to put a camera on your front door or turn an old TV into a streamer, those $40 deals are the clearest wins here. Both are cheap enough that being wrong costs you little. The AirPods Pro 3 at $199 is a decent buy too, if yours have died.

The $99 off the Apple Watch Ultra 4 is nice, but it's about 12% off a $799 watch. I'd only buy it now if you actually need one. The MacBook Neo's $30 is barely a deal, and I'd skip chasing it.

One more note on the language. Some retailers and deal sites are already using "all-time low" freely, and one CNN Underscored writer doubts that a tracker's current price will drop further by Black Friday. That's an opinion, not a promise. Retailers often rotate prices again closer to the day.

The practical move: pick the one or two items you were going to buy anyway, check that the price still holds on Amazon, and buy it if the discount is deep. If it's an Apple product with only a $30 cut, wait. Black Friday itself is weeks away, and the list will change.

My take

Honestly, this is a steal. It's still early, but if you've had your eye on something like this, the deal is worth jumping on.

Sources: Yahoo Tech, MacRumors, CNN Underscored

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

What's confirmed

Motorola's teaser says the phone is coming to the US, and the company has put up a US landing page. Android Authority reports the chip is Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, paired with an in-house cooling system called ArcticMesh. The camera setup includes a 50MP Sony LYTIA 910 main sensor and the 200MP periscope. Audio is tuned by Bang & Olufsen. Nokiamob also lists seven years of OS updates as confirmed.

What's probably true, but not official

Spec databases fill in the rest. GSMArena and PhoneArena list a 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED display at 1264 x 2780 with a 165Hz refresh rate. They also list 12GB of RAM, 256GB of UFS 4.1 storage, Android 17, IP68/IP69 ratings and a 5x optical zoom on the telephoto. Treat all of that as likely rather than settled. Gadget Review points out that battery, storage, price and display details come only from third-party databases so far. Even the battery size disagrees between listings: some say 6,000mAh with 90W charging, GSMArena says 7,000mAh.

A Geekbench listing shows 3,313 single-core and 11,088 multi-core points. It also shows 12GB of RAM and Android 17. That's a pre-launch unit, so it's a hint about performance, not a verdict.

The price problem

A European retailer briefly listed the 12GB/512GB model at €1,594.90, which Android Authority converts to roughly $1,773. Motorola hasn't confirmed that, and a retailer listing isn't a price list. One spec site guesses $899 for the US, but that's an estimate on a page marked "coming soon," not a source I'd lean on. The gap between those two numbers is about $900. Nobody should plan around either one yet.

Android Authority also notes that November 5 may not settle whether Americans can buy the phone right away. Motorola's own page just says "coming this November."

My take

Motorola is pitching this at Samsung's Ultra phones, and the hardware list backs that up. A top-tier chip, a long update promise and a 200MP zoom lens are what you'd want from a flagship. The 2nm-class silicon and the camera hardware are the interesting part, because Motorola hasn't had a phone like this in the US in a while.

But a flagship is only as good as its price and its availability. If the euro figure carries over to the US, this competes with the best phones from Samsung and Apple on their home turf, and Motorola will have to prove the camera and software hold up. If it lands closer to $900, it gets much more interesting.

What to do

If you're shopping for a high-end Android phone this season, don't buy anything before Thursday. Check three things when Motorola announces it: the US price for the 12GB/256GB model, the actual on-sale date, and the real battery capacity. Then wait for reviews, especially camera comparisons, before preordering.

My take

This might be Motorola’s biggest launch ever. On paper, it has some of the best features of any phone in 2026. It’s not out yet, but it’s coming soon, and if you’ve been waiting to upgrade, I think this one is worth preordering.

Sources: Android Authority, 9to5Google, Nokiamob, Gadget Review, GSMArena, PhoneArena, Smartprix

The same price is showing up at Best Buy and Walmart, so you aren't locked into one store. Amazon's single AirTag 2 is also down, to $23 from $29. One report says no coupon or Prime membership is needed for the four-pack price.

Is it really a record low?

Depends on who you ask. MacRumors and iClarified call $69.99 a new all-time low. 9to5Toys says it only matches the lowest price it has ever tracked at Amazon. MacPrices notes a $79.99 sale back in September, and says this is a return to the earlier record. Either way, you aren't getting a price better than anything we've seen. You're getting the best price so far, and it arrives with early Black Friday doorbuster deals, so it may not last.

What you're buying

The AirTag 2 launched in late January 2026. It has a second-generation Ultra Wideband chip, which lets Precision Finding work up to 50 percent farther away than on the original. The speaker is 50 percent louder. Precision Finding also gives step-by-step directions on Apple Watch now, not just iPhone. Apple says the battery is user-replaceable, and one report puts its life at more than a year.

Who should buy it

If you have an iPhone and a pile of things that go missing, this is the one to get. Keys, a backpack, a bike bag, a suitcase, the remote that disappears into the couch. Four tags for $69.99 beats buying four singles at $23 each, which would run $92. That's a $22 difference, or about the cost of a single tag and change.

The single pack is a weaker deal. At $23 you save only $6, so buy it only if one tag is truly all you need.

Who should skip it

Android users. These work through Apple's Find My network and an iPhone. If you're on Android, look at trackers that use Google's network instead. Also skip it if you don't actually lose things. Four trackers in a drawer is not a great use of $70, no matter how good the discount looks.

What to do

Check the price at all three stores before you buy, since they're matching right now. Then think about whether you'd use all four. If you'd use two, it's still $35 each for tags that normally cost $29, so the four-pack is only worth it if you'd really put all four to work. The big Black Friday week is still coming, so a lower price is possible, but it's not guaranteed. If you've been waiting, this is a fair place to stop waiting.

My take

This is a genuinely good deal. The original AirTag four-pack launched at $99 back in 2021, and the second generation came in at that same price with real upgrades: Precision Finding works from up to 50% farther away, the speaker is 50% louder, and you can now track from an Apple Watch

Sources: AppleInsider, MacRumors, iClarified, 9to5Toys, MacPrices, Doctor of Credit, Neowin

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The Trump Mobile T1 was announced in June 2025 at $499. Per iFixit's teardown, coverage of it, and a report published today, it's a near-exact match for HTC's 2024 midrange phone. The layout of the motherboard, cameras and cooling closely matches. The specs line up too: a 6.78-inch AMOLED screen at 120Hz and a Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip.

What's actually different

Not much, and some of it is a step backward. The T1 has a bigger battery, 5,000mAh against the HTC's 4,600mAh. One report lists the cells as 19.35Wh versus 17.23Wh. But the T1 tops out at 30W charging, while the U24 Pro does 60W. Then there's the finish. The T1 is gold, or in Bloomberg's reviewer's words, more mustard yellow than gold. The teardown also found most components come from China, which sits awkwardly next to the "Made in USA" pitch.

The price keeps moving

This is the part to watch. The $499 figure was described as an "introductory price" back in the spring. A report published today says the T1 now costs $749. I only found that figure in one source, so check Trump Mobile's own site before you assume it. If it's right, that's $250 more for a phone whose twin has been sold elsewhere for less. One earlier report listed the HTC U24 Pro at roughly $470 for 128GB and $557 for 512GB. Those prices are months old, so treat them as a ballpark.

The service side is a mixed bag too. Trump Mobile is an MVNO running on T-Mobile's network, with a $47.45 monthly plan, Truth Social preinstalled, and no account-management app. Live support runs 8 AM to 11 PM Central. The Next Web also says the phone is stuck on old security patches, and that Bloomberg's verdict was not to buy it. I haven't verified that patch claim myself.

My take

Skip the Trump Mobile T1 unless you want it as a souvenir, which is a perfectly legitimate reason to spend money. As a phone, it's a 2024 midranger with slower charging and a markup. If you like the hardware, the HTC U24 Pro is the honest version of the same thing. Better yet, compare it against current midrange phones from Samsung, Google or Xiaomi at the same price. They'll likely have newer chips and longer update promises. That's my inference, not something the teardowns tested.

If you've already preordered, read the refund terms and confirm the final price before your card gets charged. If the price is $749, you may be paying flagship money for a 2024 phone.

My take

This one surprised me. Last year Trump threatened a 25% tariff on Apple, Samsung and any company selling smartphones in the US that weren’t built here, and his administration has taken a hard line on China the whole time. So seeing this discovery is not what I expected. I’ll be watching whether it lasts, and whether it changes what phones end up costing us.

Sources: ProPakistani, The Next Web, Notebookcheck, Wccftech, Memeburn, TechRadar

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The numbers

The US price is $229, and the buds arrive in early November in black only. Some outlets round that to $230. In South Korea they went on sale October 27 for KRW 299,000, which is roughly $220. Europe is a longer wait. Samsung says a launch is coming early next year, and a UK price isn't confirmed.

Battery is the headline spec. Samsung rates the buds at up to 9.5 hours of music on one charge and up to 38 hours with the case. Talk time is up to 5.5 hours per charge, or 25 hours total. Other specs:

• 11.3mm TwinBoost speaker, which adjusts volume to ambient noise
• Qualcomm Snapdragon S7 Gen 1 Sound Platform
• Bluetooth 6.2
• IP54 rating, so splashes and dust are fine but swimming isn't
• Touch controls on the back of each bud, plus head gestures to answer or end calls
• Samsung's Audio Leakage Reduction, meant to keep sound more private

What you give up

Open-ear buds can't do active noise cancellation, and Samsung says so. You're buying awareness, not isolation. That suits outdoor runs, bike commutes and offices where someone might talk to you. It doesn't suit trains or planes. At this price you'd have to want that trade on purpose, and few people will buy these alongside a pair of noise-cancelling buds.

Who should care

Phone matters here. The spec sheet lists Android 12 or later with more than 1.5GB of memory. Galaxy owners can connect through the Quick Panel without opening the Wearable app. Gemini Live hands-free is also listed. iPhone users get no stated reason to pick these over the established open-ear brands.

My view: the battery and weight are the real pitch, and they're competitive on paper. But $229 is a lot for buds nobody has tested yet. The 38-hour total is also a lab figure. Open-ear designs usually lose their bass first and their battery second once volume goes up outdoors, so treat Samsung's numbers as a ceiling.

What to do

If you run or ride and own a Galaxy phone, put these on a watch list. Don't pre-order. Wait for independent reviews on fit, since clip designs live or die on how they sit on real ears, and on how well they hold up with wind noise. If you're on iPhone or live in Europe, you can skip this round. You'll have until 2027 to see how the first buyers get on.

My take

Clip on open ear buds are taking over the earbuds market and there are some good designs from other companies but i think would kill it if it came to the sound quality , now this releases in 2027 and i think this would be a really good thing to wait for , but the prices of $299 makes me question the added features and if anything special about this device

Sources: Stuff, Notebookcheck, TechSpot, Fone Arena, Basic Tutorials, JAM Online

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Amazon announced the Echo Time on October 28 and it's on sale the same day for $199.99. It comes in Graphite, Glacier White and Coral Pink. A matching adjustable stand is a separate $39.99. There's also an Amazon Kids version in Galactic Grape and Cosmic Lime, starting at $209.99, with a year of Kids+ included.

What you get

The screen is a 3.2-inch circular touchscreen with hundreds of customizable clock faces. Those include analog designs, seasonal themes, sports teams, and licensed picks like Harry Potter and the DC Universe. At night the display can drop below 0.3 nits, and Night Mode cuts blue light. The screen can also brighten gradually like a sunrise before the alarm.

The sleep tracking relies on Amazon's Omnisense sensor array, which can detect presence and temperature, plus an ultrasound sensor that monitors breathing. Sleep sensing stays off unless you turn it on, according to Bloomberg's reporting as relayed by Quartz. Amazon also says the device has earned the National Sleep Foundation's SleepMark certification.

Then there's the part some people will care about most: no camera. Mics are there, and you can mute them with a button on top, but nothing is watching your bedroom. Some features need Alexa+, which Amazon includes with Prime.

The price problem

TechRadar lists the Echo Spot at $109.99. The Echo Time costs $199.99, the same as the Echo Show 8. Tom's Guide makes the same point: the Echo Spot costs about half as much, does the basic clock job well, and has the same Alexa+ features. It even doubles as an Eero Wi-Fi extender.

So who is this for? Someone who wants better sleep data and a gentler alarm and doesn't want a camera on the nightstand. If you just want a bedside clock that talks, the Echo Spot is the sane buy. I'd also treat the smart alarm as unproven. Nobody has published long-term results yet, and an alarm that fires up to an hour early is a hard sell if your schedule has no slack.

One small inconsistency: Engadget lists the screen as 2.3 inches, while Amazon says 3.2 inches. Go with Amazon's number, but check the listing before you order.

Amazon's devices tend to get discounted over time, so if you're curious but not convinced, wait for early reviews and the first price cut. Then decide whether the sleep features justify the roughly $90 premium over the Echo Spot.

My take

The Echo Time is a really cool redesign. It brings back the round Echo Spot look, with new colors (Graphite, Glacier White and Coral Pink) and sleep-sensing smart alarms that wake you in a lighter sleep phase, no wearable needed.At $199.99, though, it isn’t cheap. The Echo Spot costs about half as much, so this is worth it mainly if the sleep features matter to you. It only launched on October 28, so full reviews aren’t out yet.

Sources: Amazon, TechRadar, Tom's Guide, 9to5Toys, Quartz, Engadget, BGR

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

What's reportedly coming

Bloomberg's Mark Gurman says three machines are on deck. The headline act is a redesigned 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro with an OLED touchscreen. One report says it swaps the notch for a Dynamic Island. Oddly, those are expected to run the M5 Pro and M5 Max, the same chips Apple shipped in March. So the display and the chip generation are on separate schedules this time.

Then there's the boring-but-useful pair. An entry 14-inch MacBook Pro gets the M6 chip, which debuted in the Mac mini in August, and so does the 24-inch iMac. MacRumors says no design changes have been rumored for either. The iMac would jump from the M4 straight to the M6, and reports mention new colors, Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.

The price question

This is where I'd be careful. The cheapest MacBook Pro already costs $1,999 after Apple raised it in June, which Macworld ties to supply chain constraints. Several outlets expect the M6 version to stay there. The current M5 Pro and M5 Max models start at $2,499 and $2,999.

The OLED touch models are the real unknown. Estimates disagree: one reported figure is $2,999 for the 14-inch and $3,499 for the 16-inch, while another outlet says $2,800 and $3,300. Gurman reportedly expects a "significantly higher" price. Treat all of it as guesswork until Apple posts a number. The iMac's $1,499 starting price is also speculation.

My take

If you need a laptop now and don't care about touch, the M6 14-inch is probably the sensible target, assuming it holds the line at $1,999. It's a chip swap, and nobody should pay extra for a rumor. The iMac is similar: a quiet upgrade, mostly interesting if you're on an older Intel or early M1 machine.

The touchscreen model is the one to be skeptical about. Apple's earlier OLED moves on the iPhone and iPad Pro both raised prices, and one developer-focused write-up points out that macOS has no published touch APIs yet. Paying a premium for a touch layer on an operating system that currently treats your finger like a mouse cursor is a bet on future software.

What to do

Wait for the actual price sheet and the first hands-on reviews before you order anything. One report says the hardware ships the same day, but that's also unconfirmed. If you're set on the M6 model, check whether the base storage is 512GB or 1TB, since that detail is still being debated.

My take

Even with this news, the iPad Pro may still be useful, but I think a touchscreen MacBook Pro is a big deal. If the rumors are accurate, a maxed-out MacBook Pro with a touchscreen could be a great deal for creators who currently use both a MacBook and an iPad, because they wouldn't have to carry two devices anymore. The catch is price, and Apple hasn't confirmed any details yet.

Sources: AppleScoop, Macworld, Northeast Times, Basic Tutorials, byteiota, 9to5Mac, Tech Insider

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The rest of the update is real. The screen grows to 8.5 inches, with bezels trimmed by 24%. The body is 5.4 mm thick and weighs 0.56 pound. Apple quotes peak brightness of up to 1,200 nits, more than double the last model, and the tablet gets an IP67 water and dust rating. There's also a landscape front camera and a speaker setup Apple calls Acoustic Display. A nano-texture glass option, the glare-cutting finish from the iPad Pro, costs $100 extra and is only offered on the 256GB and 512GB models.

The price

The Wi-Fi model with 128GB starts at $699, and Wi-Fi + Cellular starts at $849. The 256GB Wi-Fi model is $799. That's $200 over the $499 the 2024 model launched at. Apple raised that older model to $599 in June, so the gap you're really weighing is $100.

What's still missing

Apple didn't say what refresh rate the new OLED runs at. PhoneArena flagged that as an open question, and one retailer's write-up of Apple's comparison page says there's no 120Hz ProMotion listed. That isn't confirmed by Apple, so treat it as likely rather than settled. If it's true, a $699 tablet you scroll and write on all day will still feel a step behind pricier iPads. The older mini's 60Hz screen and jelly scrolling were already its main complaints.

Who should care

If you have a 2024 iPad mini and it works, skip this. A better screen and water resistance don't justify $699, particularly with a five-core chip in the tier you'd probably buy. If you want a small tablet for reading in bed, travel or the kitchen, the OLED and IP67 are the best reasons to upgrade, and the $599 older model is the cheaper fallback. Anyone planning to pay for 512GB just to get the full chip should do the math against the larger iPads first, because $999 is a lot for a mini.

What to do before you buy

Pre-orders open Wednesday, October 28, in 36 countries, including the US. Deliveries and store availability start Friday, November 6, in midnight and starlight. Wait for independent reviews and benchmarks that compare the five-core and six-core versions, and check the refresh rate. If the screen is stuck at 60Hz, that's your cue to hold off.

My take

Apple release their main products , and release their replacements for their own main products , the iPhone duo just came on the market and i want to know - which apple glazer , i mean user would get the iPad mini , when there's a portable replacement like the iPhone duo , i mean for now the budget option for an iPhone duo with a better screen would be the iPad mini

Sources: PhoneArena, TechCrunch, Thurrott.com, DealnTech, AppleMagazine, Zeera Wireless

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

That's a small fix for a real annoyance, and Schiit didn't raise the price to make it. The Mani 3 costs $149, the same as the Mani 2 it replaces.

What else changed

Inside, Schiit swapped the previous OPA1612 gain-stage chips for Analog Devices AD4898 op-amps. It also uses a passive RIAA network, a DC-coupled design, a revised DC servo and a linear power supply. New to this version are microprocessor supervision and sealed-relay switching. The processor mutes the output briefly when you change gain, so you shouldn't get a thump through your speakers.

Schiit claims RIAA accuracy within ±0.15dB. It also claims a signal-to-noise ratio above 100dB at the 40dB setting most MM cartridges use, dropping to 87dB at 60dB for MC. Those are the company's numbers, not independent measurements. Schiit's own pitch about the performance gain is modest: better "by a bit, not a mile."

Less-used settings, like specialized cartridge loading and the low-frequency filter, stay on switches at the back. That seems a sensible split, since most people set those once and forget them.

Who should care

If you're buying your first dedicated phono stage, or your receiver's built-in one is mediocre, this is a cheap, sensible step. It handles MM, MC and MI cartridges, so you have room to upgrade the cartridge later without replacing the preamp. It's also made in Texas, and the warranty now runs three years.

If you already own a Mani 2 and never touch the gain, skip it. Schiit's own framing says the sound improvement is small, and the main upgrade is convenience. That's a good reason to buy new, but a weak one to upgrade.

Before you order

Black is in stock now. Silver is listed but not yet available. Returns are accepted within 15 days, minus a 15% restocking fee, so confirm your cartridge's needs before you buy rather than counting on a free return. The US version is 115VAC only, and Schiit lists other adaptors for 230V regions. If you're outside the US, pick the right plug at checkout, because the standard model won't work in 220 to 240V countries.

Check your cartridge's output type first. Then match it to a gain step: 40dB is the usual starting point for MM, and MC cartridges generally need more.

My take

With my take , i think its a fair price and should be something worth buying with someone with some interest in these gadgets

Sources: Darko.Audio, Schiit Audio, Gear Patrol, eCoustics, AudioHead, Amazon

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

What Technics announced

The SL-1210MKX is the new top model in the SL-1200 line. It sits above the SL-1210MK7. Per MusicTech, it has a heavier chassis, a ±4% pitch range that's a first for the series, and the new ±50% option. It was shown publicly at Pacific in Amsterdam during the 30th anniversary edition of Amsterdam Dance Event.

Technics says it built the deck with working DJs and sound engineers. The target is touring, club and festival DJs, plus scratch and performance specialists. The company pitches it at high-pressure settings with powerful sound systems, deep bass and long hours.

Price and timing

It goes on sale in January 2027 at £1,299, or €1,499. I couldn't find a US price or a US date, so treat both as not confirmed. The launch also lines up with the 55th anniversary of the SL-1200 series, which Technics dates to 1972.

How it compares

For a rough yardstick, Technics' US store lists the Technics SL-1200MK7 at $1,299.99. A retailer listing for that model describes pitch faders at ±8% and ±16%. That's a different currency and a different market, so don't read the numbers as a like-for-like price comparison. Still, the UK price of the MKX looks like it's in the same ballpark as the MK7's US sticker. Technics hasn't said what the heavier chassis weighs, so I can't tell you how much bulkier it is than the MK7's listed 9.6 kg.

Who should care

If you play records at home, the MK7 already covers the basics, and a ±50% pitch slider won't change your listening. Most people never push a deck far from its set speed. Extreme pitch ranges are a performance tool. Same goes for the weight. A heavier body is aimed at bass-heavy rooms where vibration is a real problem, not a living room shelf.

If you're a working DJ, or a bedroom scratch DJ who wants the pro deck, this is a more interesting upgrade. Technics clearly built it for the booth rather than for the audiophile crowd.

What to do

Don't pre-order anything yet. There's no US pricing, and a deck that costs this much deserves a proper look at reviews first. If you need a turntable now, the MK7 is still listed and isn't going anywhere. If you're a DJ, wait for the US announcement and for early impressions of how the new pitch range feels in practice.

My take

This would be a good purchase for anyone interested in getting this device , i think vinyl have come a long way . but i don't see them dying off , because of the quality and the feeling of sound and music it produces , which also goes for this device

Sources: MusicTech, Technics US, Turntable Lab, Gear Patrol

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

What happened

Oura has sued Ultrahuman again in a federal court in Texas. It wants to stop US sales of the Ultrahuman Ring Pro. The suit claims the ring infringes two patents, a design patent (D804,471) and a utility patent (12,769,363). According to the reports, the utility patent covers a ring with a curved battery, a circuit board, magnets and sensors. Oura is asking for monetary damages and a permanent injunction. It also named SVTronics as a defendant. Oura says SVTronics builds the Ring Pro in Plano, Texas, under Ultrahuman's direction.

Why this is a rerun

Ultrahuman's earlier Ring Air was barred from US import after Oura won an International Trade Commission ruling in August 2025. The company then redesigned the ring. The Ultrahuman Ring Pro launched in February, and US Customs and Border Protection ruled in its favor in March. That ruling is what let Ultrahuman back into the American market.

Oura says the customs decision only covered the patent from the earlier fight, not these two. Ultrahuman says the redesign has already been through independent review. Its CEO, Mohit Kumar, told TechCrunch there is no court order affecting the Ring Pro and that it remains available in the US. Oura's own statement accuses Ultrahuman of a history of copying. Neither side's claims have been tested in a final ruling.

This also isn't Oura's first target. The suit follows earlier patent disputes with Samsung and RingConn.

Who should care

If you own a Ring Pro, nothing changes today. Nobody has ordered anything. Patent cases are slow, and the first fight ran from 2023 to a ban in 2025. A sales block is unlikely to arrive next week.

If you're about to buy one, the risk is different. I couldn't confirm a US price or any refund or support commitments in the sources I found, so I won't guess. The practical worry is a possible injunction later. That could leave you with a ring whose future sales, accessories and replacements are uncertain. That is speculation on my part, not something the reports say. I'd also note that the earlier redesign did clear customs, which is a point in Ultrahuman's favor.

My take: this is mostly a fight between two companies, and the lawsuit alone is no reason to panic. But if you were on the fence between an Oura ring and the Ultrahuman Ring Pro, the lawsuit gives you a small, real reason to lean toward the safer option. The cheaper ring isn't much of a deal if it ends up stranded.

What to do

Buy from a retailer with a generous return window, and keep your receipt. Watch the Eastern District of Texas docket for any motion seeking a preliminary injunction. That would be the first sign this is moving faster than the headlines suggest.

My take

this is really not a surprise to me because side by side , this looks like the same devices , and think its time to call out the copy cats out with this law suit , but i truly wish them all the best the fact that ultra human can still make it out there , congrats and Goodluck

Sources: TechCrunch, Engadget, The 5K Runner, Newscord, UA.news

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

That's the catch. Here's the rest of the picture.

What you get for $149

Apple announced the HomePod mini 2 on October 13. It's the first major update to the little speaker since the original arrived in November 2020. Pre-orders are open, and Apple says it lands October 30 in the U.S. and more than 23 other countries and regions. It comes in pink, green, blue, white and midnight, with color-matched woven power cables.

Inside is the Apple S10 chip, which handles computational audio that tunes dynamic range and loudness in real time. Connectivity moves up to Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 6, plus Thread and an Ultra Wideband chip. Bring a compatible iPhone close and music hands off to the speaker. It can also be the default audio output for Macs with Wi-Fi 6E or later, as a single speaker or a stereo pair. It still works as a home hub, and it can listen for smoke or carbon monoxide alarms and send an alert.

Apple's own product copy talks about the speaker being "compact," and the specs back that up. This is still one full-range driver with dual passive radiators. Macworld says the biggest improvements are in software, audio capabilities and wireless connectivity, not the physical design.

The price creep

The original HomePod mini launched at $99. Apple raised it to $129 in June 2026, then to $149 with this model. That's a 50% jump over five years for a speaker that looks about the same. In the UK it's £129.

The surround sound option adds up fast, too. Four-speaker home theater needs an Apple TV 4K, and four HomePod mini 2 units alone come to $596 before you've paid for the box.

Who should buy it

If you're deep in Apple's world, own a Mac with Wi-Fi 6E, and want a small speaker for a desk or kitchen, this is a sensible buy. The Mac speaker feature is a real reason to pick it over a generic Bluetooth speaker. If you have a big room, look at the $349 HomePod instead. A mini isn't built to fill it.

If you're buying mainly for Siri AI, wait. Without a compatible iPhone or iPad, the speaker still handles general knowledge, conversation and music discovery. But the personal-context features need that pairing, and the software isn't here at launch. Paying $149 now for a promise is the part I'd skip.

What to watch

Gear Patrol reports Costco is already selling the speaker below retail, so check there before paying Apple's price. I haven't seen a confirmed Costco price, so verify it yourself. Also watch for the Siri AI rollout date. Once it's live and people have used it on the speaker, you'll know whether the wait was worth it.

My take

The new Siri ? , the home pod mini was released for this assistant , but the assistant knows nothing and is late and doing bad in this era of ai , the fact is this , the release of the new home mini and the beautiful redesign won't let me see Siri differently , because it still sucks on my phone

Sources: Macworld, MacRumors, MacRumors, The Apple Post, The Shortcut, Top Trusted Products, Gear Patrol

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

That's the practical story. The rest is what you'd be waiting for.

What it is

The iPhone Duo is Apple's first foldable, and it's book-style. It has a 5.4-inch outer display and a 7.6-inch inner one. Apple says it's the largest iPhone screen ever. It's about 5.2mm thick unfolded, 11.3mm folded, and weighs 254 grams. Inside is the A20 Pro chip with 12GB of RAM, and the battery is 4,883 mAh split across two cells. Apple's numbers: up to 44 hours of video on the outer display, 31 on the inner, and 24 mixed. It reaches 50% in roughly 20 minutes on a 60W wired adapter.

What it costs

It starts at $1,999 for 256GB. The 512GB model is $2,199, 1TB is $2,599, and 2TB is $3,199. Colors are Star White and Night Sky. Apple's own financing works out to $83.29 a month over 24 months for the base model. Cases are extra: the iPhone Duo Case is $79, and the iPhone Duo Folio with Kickstand is $129.

What you give up

This is where I'd slow down. AT&T's listing spells out the tradeoffs against the iPhone 18 Pro models: no Face ID, no telephoto lens, a $700 higher starting price, and a later ship date. Touch ID returns, built into the side button. The cameras are a 48MP main, a 48MP ultra wide and a 12MP outer camera, so there's no zoom lens at all.

Who should care

My view: buy it only if you want a small phone and a tablet in one pocket and you're fine paying a $700 premium for the format. It makes sense for people who read, work or watch video on their phone all day. It makes much less sense if you mostly take photos. A cheaper Pro does the camera job better and arrives sooner.

Early reviews are positive. Engadget calls it a treat for iPhone users unwilling to switch to Android, though heavy and expensive. That fits the spec sheet. I haven't handled one, so I'm not adding my own verdict on the hinge or the crease.

What to do now

If you want one, order now rather than waiting for reviews to settle. Apple is still taking orders, but the queue only grows. Check your carrier's trade-in math before you commit, because AT&T's pricing page lists far lower monthly costs with an eligible trade-in. A second wave of 28 more countries and regions launches October 30. And don't forget that a $79 to $129 case is a real part of the total.

If you can wait, wait. Foldables tend to get thinner, lighter and cheaper over time, and Apple has never been shy about iterating.

My take

i have had many tweets about this device already with its release and i want to say its a mix of feelings for me , knowing that the screen is the problem and the fact that they are late to the game of foldables , they have waited to release such a device but still sucks because of its screen and under display camera , which for the first trails of most companies doesn't work

Sources: MacRumors, Make Tech Easier, Macworld, AT&T, T-Mobile, Wikipedia, Engadget

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Sony announced three players this week. Alongside the Sony NW-WM1ZM3 are the Sony NW-WM1AM3 at $2,999.99 and the Sony NW-ZX900 at $1,899.99. All three run Android 16, and US preorders opened October 15.

What the money buys

The flagship has a gold-plated main chassis machined from 99.99% pure oxygen-free copper. This time the rear chassis is copper too, where the last generation used aluminium. Sony says the copper gives a more stable ground connection, and claims stronger bass, a wider soundstage and smoother highs. Those are Sony's claims, not measured results. Inside is Kimber Kable wiring borrowed from Sony's DMP-Z1 desktop player.

The Sony NW-WM1AM3 keeps an aluminium-alloy main chassis with a gold-plated copper rear. It has the same 5.5-inch Full HD screen, 128 GB of storage and a weight of about 425 g. The flagship has 256 GB.

The Sony NW-ZX900 is the practical one. It has a 5-inch screen, 64 GB, about 345 g, and a rated 40 hours of MP3 playback against 35 on the other two. Both of the bigger models list 250 mW per channel from the 4.4 mm balanced output, and the ZX900 matches that figure.

The price problem

One report says the Sony NW-WM1ZM3 costs almost £1,000 more than its predecessor. It also notes the previous model is now discounted to roughly $2,600. Taken at face value, you could buy the old flagship for less than half the new price. Sony's pitch is revised power circuitry, an updated noise shaper and DSD remastering that now works on streamed audio. That's real engineering, but it reads as a refinement, not a leap.

I'd skip the Sony NW-WM1ZM3 unless you're a collector or you already own the previous one and have money you can't find a use for. If you actually want a dedicated player for wired headphones, the Sony NW-ZX900 looks like the sane entry point, and a discounted last-generation unit may be saner still.

Check before you pay

Release details are messy. Sony Japan confirmed November 27, 2026, with prices of about ¥655,000, ¥347,000 and ¥215,000. Sony's US store reportedly estimates January 2027 deliveries, and one retailer listing shows December 7 for two models and January 12 for the flagship. Other outlets quote different prices for other regions, so confirm the figure for your country. Preorders aren't a reason to rush. If you want one, look at what the previous model costs right now and compare before you put down money.

My take

I don't see the point of this than just a waste of money , this is also not offering a feature worth trying and even with my take , people are still going to spend money on wanting the feeling of having the a new redesign iPod

Sources: The PC Enthusiast, Porta-Fi, Tech AI Wire, What Hi-Fi?, ASCII.jp, BTTR, Audiomatome

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The core appeal hasn't changed. Both use FPGA chips that directly recreate the original console hardware instead of emulating it, meaning zero-lag gameplay and pixel-perfect accuracy. The Super Nt+ runs 2,200+ Super Nintendo and Super Famicom cartridges. The Mega Sg+ handles Genesis and Mega Drive games, plus older Sega systems with included adapters. Games display at up to 1080p over HDMI.

What's new is convenience. The biggest upgrade is wireless support—both consoles now have built-in Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless connectivity. You can pair controllers from 8BitDo and other third-party makers, and power the systems on and off from a gamepad. USB-C replaces the older power input, bundling a 30W power supply and cable. A new USB-A port sits on the back for future expansory (currently limited to Analogue's DAC accessory). Wired controller ports remain for legacy gear.

Each box also includes two dry Analogue Cartridge Cleaners, which remove cartridge pin oxidation without chemicals—a practical addition for anyone pulling old games from storage.

At $219.99 each, the price stays flat from the originals. That undercuts competing retro gaming options and makes the upgrade accessible for anyone who already owned the last-gen models. Still missing: save states, screenshots, and overclocking features that Analogue reserves for its pricier Analogue 3D system. Both consoles cap out at 1080p; no 4K support here. They also don't run ROM files or support openFPGA modifications.

The real draw for collectors is that you can finally use wireless controllers without clutter, charge via USB-C like everything else on your desk, and swap cartridges without powering down. Those quality-of-life changes make the Super Nt+ and Mega Sg+ credible refresh targets for anyone tired of cables.

My take

It would definitely worth upgrading to the wireless option , that's for my take , but if the wired still works for you , you might have to stick with that and honestly save some bucks

Sources: TweakTown, Engadget, Techtroduce, TechMyMoney

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

It's one of four trackers in Belkin's first own-brand range. Until now the company made accessories for other people's trackers. All of them work with both Apple's Find My network and Google's Find Hub, which means you don't have to pick a side of the phone war before buying.

What's in the range

• Belkin SureFind Spot: the basic one. It has an integrated metal key ring and, per Belkin, up to 12 months of battery on a replaceable coin cell. US price is $14.99.
• Belkin SureFind Loop Cable Tag: the cable one above. US price is $24.99. It carries an IPX4 rating, so splashes are fine and swimming is not.
• Belkin SureFind Card: wallet-shaped, IP68-rated, and claimed to last up to three years. Its battery can't be replaced or recharged, according to Belkin's support page. US price is $26.99.
• Belkin SureFind Wallet Stand: a magnetic phone stand with card storage, RFID blocking and a tracker that can't be easily removed. US price is $39.99, and it was slated for early October. I couldn't confirm it's shipping yet.

Pricing varies a lot by region. Australian retailers list the Spot at $29.95 and the Card and Loop Cable Tag at $44.95 each. Those are local-currency prices, so don't read them as a US markup. The US numbers come from the earlier announcement.

Who should care

If your household mixes iPhones and Androids, this is the pitch that matters. One tracker type, either phone can find it. The built-in attachment hardware is a nice touch too, since you skip the separate holder most trackers need.

The Card is the one I'd think twice about. A sealed battery means a three-year tracker that you throw away after three years. That's fine for a spare wallet slot, less fine if you care about waste. The Wallet Stand makes more sense as a phone accessory with a tracker bolted on than the other way around.

My pick is the Loop Cable Tag for a bag or luggage, where a spare cable is genuinely useful and a four-month charge cycle is easy to remember. Buy the Spot if you want the cheapest option for keys. Check the pricing for your region before you order, and check that Belkin's listing matches the model you want, because the Card and Loop Cable Tag cost the same in some markets and differ in others.

My take

There are some many Belkin devices listed on apple's website and for some reasons for many people feel it can trusted because it is recommended by apple , but the belkin smart trackers are pretty handy and really good to use , and i wonder if belkin shares their technologies with apple with the aim of marketing , just like beat by dre owned by apple , And now thats a story people have to discover

Sources: TBreak, 9to5Google, Gadget Guy, EFTM, BTTR Reviews

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

You press a button on the ring, speak, and release. The Interface sends your request to an AI agent of your choosing—Claude, ChatGPT, Meta's Muse, Grok—and returns the result. No phone required. The stainless steel ring sits on your index finger and connects to more than 140 agents through NatureOS, Natura's software ecosystem.

The hardware calculus is sharp. Natura's costs to manufacture the Interface track closely with Oura's production overhead, yet Oura retails at $350. Natura is absorbing the difference: early adopters pay $99, which drops to free for three to six months after purchase. After that free window, subscription pricing kicks in at $9 per month. The annual cost rises beyond the launch hardware price, but still undercuts Galaxy Ring's flat $400 outlay.

Battery life sits between six and twelve days depending on usage, with a full charge taking roughly 100 minutes. The ring also doubles as a health tracker—the device monitors heart rate, sleep, activity, and skin temperature—so users get passive monitoring even when they're not commanding agents. Natura runs this tracking on a custom low-power chip that operates independently via Bluetooth when disconnected from a phone.

Preorders open next month with shipments targeted for December or January. There's a catch worth noting: Natura's official product page currently lists Interface as a waitlist offering, meaning final pricing and delivery details remain unconfirmed. The $99 figure comes from TechCrunch's initial reporting, not from a locked checkout.

The bigger question isn't price or battery life. It's whether a single physical button can become a genuinely useful interface for AI agents in daily life. Founder Carlo Edoardo Ferraris built the Interface after concluding that people need 24/7 access to AI without reaching for their phone. The ring tests that premise. If it works, the form factor matters less than the motion: press, speak, release. If it doesn't, you're wearing another device that promises to reduce screen time while actually just adding complexity.

No independent reviews exist yet. Natura has not announced a broader retail rollout beyond the initial launch window. Battery claims, agent response times, and health tracking accuracy all remain unconfirmed by third parties. For a $99 wearable with subscription strings attached, that's the real risk—not the price tag.

My take

This feature i would say is not made on many wearable devices , with a quarter of the price of the galaxy ring , the natura smart ring should really be consider one of the best smart ring devices out there with an affordable price , a company like apple can be behind the scenes of this company , either learning new technologies or actually investing in them in the near future

Sources: GamesBeat, Yahoo Finance, Gadget Review, News Source, Agentic Ready, Tech Buzz, Superintelligence News, SolidAI Tech, Newsy Today

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. TechByDave is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Some links in this post may be affiliate links; if you buy something through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.